Professor Wall Street: A Paid Propagandist for the UNC’s Cynical Game?

In the murky world of political messaging, where optics often trump substance, few things sting quite like betrayal. Enter "Professor Wall Street," a recurring figure on WZYE TV, whose polished commentary and sharp suits might fool you into thinking he’s an independent voice. But peel back the layers, and a troubling narrative emerges: is he a paid propagandist for the United National Congress (UNC), a party some accuse of cloaking its Indian-centric agenda in Black faces to sell its message? If so, what does it mean when a Black man becomes the mouthpiece for a group critics call an "Indian racist party"? Let’s dig in.

The UNC’s Playbook: Black Faces, Indian Interests?

The United National Congress, a major political force in Trinidad and Tobago, has long been tied to the country’s Indian community. Its leadership, policies, and voter base often reflect this demographic reality. But politics isn’t just about who you are—it’s about who you can convince to stand with you. And that’s where the accusation of "Black face" propaganda comes in. Critics argue the UNC has mastered the art of trotting out Black surrogates to broaden its appeal, deflect accusations of racial bias, and push its agenda to a wider audience. It’s a strategy as old as politics itself: control the narrative by controlling the messenger.

Enter Professor Wall Street. With his platform on WZYE TV, he’s got the mic, the audience, and the gravitas to sway opinions. But who’s writing his script? If the whispers are true—that he’s on the UNC’s payroll—then his role starts to look less like journalism and more like a calculated performance. A Black man championing a party that some say prioritizes Indian interests over others? That’s not just optics; it’s a chess move.

Selling Out: A Betrayal of His Own?

Let’s call it what it is: if Professor Wall Street is indeed a UNC shill, he’s a sellout. Not just to some abstract ideal, but to the very community he’s presumed to represent. Trinidad and Tobago’s history is a tapestry of racial tension—Black and Indian communities have jostled for power, resources, and recognition since the colonial days. For a Black man to lend his face and voice to a party accused of sidelining Black interests in favor of an Indian elite? That’s a gut punch. It’s not just about taking the paycheck; it’s about what that paycheck buys—credibility for a party that might not earn it otherwise.

The optics are brutal. Every time Professor Wall Street steps in front of the camera, he’s not just delivering commentary—he’s potentially laundering the UNC’s image. “See?” they can say. “We’ve got Black support. We’re not racist.” But if the party’s core remains an Indian power bloc with little regard for equitable representation, then his presence is a mask, not a bridge. And for what? A cushy gig? A pat on the back from the UNC brass? It’s hard to see how that justifies turning your back on your own people.

WZYE TV: Platform or Puppet Stage?

Then there’s WZYE TV itself. A media outlet’s job is to inform, not to parrot party lines—or at least, that’s the ideal. But if Professor Wall Street’s airtime is bought and paid for by the UNC, what does that say about the station? Is it a legitimate platform for debate, or just a megaphone for hire? Media in Trinidad and Tobago isn’t exactly known for its pristine independence—political influence runs deep—but this would take it to another level. A Black commentator spouting UNC talking points on a channel that’s in on the game? That’s not news; it’s theater.

The Bigger Picture: Race, Power, and Propaganda

This isn’t just about one man or one party. It’s about how race gets weaponized in the scramble for power. The UNC isn’t the first to play this game—parties worldwide have used tokenism to dodge accountability. But in a country like Trinidad and Tobago, where racial divides are raw and real, the stakes feel higher. A Black man fronting for an "Indian racist party" isn’t just a personal failing; it’s a symptom of a system that thrives on division and distrust.

So, is Professor Wall Street a paid propagandist? We don’t have the receipts—yet. But the suspicion alone is damning. If he’s cashing UNC checks while pretending to speak truth to power, he’s not just a sellout—he’s a cog in a machine that’s happy to exploit Black faces to keep its grip on influence. And that’s a betrayal that cuts deeper than any paycheck can justify.

What do you think? Is Professor Wall Street a willing pawn, or just a guy caught in the crossfire? Drop your take below—let’s unpack this mess together.